By P Mohan Chandran
In a world where every misstep can lead to a cascade of consequences, how do we ensure that those who wield the gavel are as accountable as those who wield the scalpel? When a doctor's diagnosis can be a matter of life and death, and a judge's verdict can alter the course of someone's life, shouldn't both be held to the highest standards of accountability?
The contrasting verdicts in the Salman Khan hit-and-run case serve as a stark reminder of the inconsistencies that can arise within our justice system. Two courts, with the same evidence and bound by the same laws, reached divergent conclusions. This begs the question: If the very pillars of our justice system can interpret the same situation so differently, how can we ensure consistency and fairness?
While doctors, especially in high-pressure environments like government hospitals, are expected to make split-second decisions, judges often have the luxury of time. Yet, the repercussions for misdiagnosis can be swift and severe, while a judge's misjudgment might never face scrutiny. This glaring disparity in accountability between the two professions is hard to ignore.
So, how can we level the playing field and ensure that judges are held accountable on par with doctors?
1. Performance Reviews: Just as doctors undergo regular evaluations to assess their clinical skills and patient outcomes, judges should be subject to periodic reviews. These reviews could assess their understanding of the law, the consistency of their verdicts, and their ability to manage and expedite cases.
2. Transparent Reporting: A public database detailing the verdicts, rationale, and any overturned decisions can offer insights into a judge's performance over time. This transparency will not only foster trust but also allow for informed critiques.
3. Continuing Education: The medical field constantly evolves, and doctors are required to stay updated. Similarly, as societal norms and laws change, judges should undergo regular training to ensure they're in tune with the times.
4. Feedback Mechanisms: Just as patients can rate their doctors, a system where lawyers, plaintiffs, and defendants can provide anonymous feedback on judges can offer valuable insights into areas of improvement.
5. Establishing an Independent Oversight Body: An independent body, separate from the judiciary, can investigate complaints against judges, ensuring unbiased evaluations and, if necessary, recommend corrective actions.
In a world where the fees of renowned lawyers make headlines and the fees of medical professionals face scrutiny, it's essential to remember that both health and justice are fundamental rights. As we navigate the complexities of accountability, we must ask ourselves: Are we doing enough to ensure that those who pass judgment are themselves judged fairly? And more importantly, isn't it time we ensure that the scales of justice are balanced for all?
Do you agree that Judges should be made as accountable as Doctors?
A. Yes, both uphold human life and should be accountable.
B. No, Judges are above doctors and are not accountable.
© 2023. P Mohan Chandran. All Rights Reserved.
27072023
Comments