By P Mohan Chandran
Have you ever wondered why we revere some characters in our mythology while others, although potent and mighty, invoke a sense of disapproval? The Indian epics of the Mahabharata and Ramayana brim with multifaceted personalities, each exhibiting a spectrum of human behavior that offers profound lessons to ponder. Two such legendary characters, Bhishma and Jatayu, despite being in similar situations, displayed starkly contrasting responses. This article explores their choices and the resonating impacts they had, prompting us to reflect upon the path we would take if faced with a moral quandary.
Bhishma, the Grand Sire in the epic Mahabharata, was renowned for his immense martial prowess, wisdom, and unwavering loyalty towards Hastinapur. Juxtaposing Bhishma's character with Jatayu, the vulture king from the Ramayana, known more for his righteousness and bravery, presents a compelling narrative. Despite his age and limited physical abilities, Jatayu fearlessly confronted Ravana to rescue Sita, highlighting that power is not about physical strength but a deep-seated resolve to help.
When it comes to life and death, Bhishma chose a life that led to an internal death of conscience, while Jatayu embraced a physical death that immortalized him in the annals of moral rectitude. This contrast emphasizes the importance of adhering to one's conscience, our only constant companion through life's journey.
The narratives around Bhishma and Jatayu also highlight the weight of a single act that can uplift or tarnish one's reputation for eternity. Bhishma's silence during Draupadi's disrobing cast a shadow over his illustrious life, whereas Jatayu's valiant act against Ravana ensured his eternal honor.
Cultural norms often label us, but our actions define who we truly are. Bhishma, a highly cultured human, acted as an impassive observer, while Jatayu, considered an uncultured vulture, exhibited remarkable empathy and courage. In this, we see the blurring of lines between what constitutes a human and a beast.
Our words, spoken or unspoken, communicate our intentions and desires. While Bhishma failed to heed Draupadi's pleas for protection, Jatayu, a mere bird, understood both Sita's spoken and unspoken words. This comparison underlines the power of emotional intelligence and empathy.
In the maze of duty and morals, Bhishma faltered, while Jatayu's clarity about his moral duty shone through. Here lies a lesson on the importance of following our hearts and standing by the higher principles when faced with a dilemma.
Their choices further defined the precedents they set for generations to come. Bhishma, by not interfering in Draupadi's disrobing, set a disturbing precedent, while Jatayu's selfless act established an ideal model of valor and virtue.
Interestingly, Bhishma, a relative to Draupadi, distanced himself when she needed him the most. In contrast, Jatayu, a stranger to Sita, exhibited the selfless love of a dear relative. This contrast underlines that true relationships transcend the bounds of bodily connections and are anchored in the heart's affinities.
Lastly, their associations shaped their character and decisions. Bhishma, despite his wisdom, associated with the Kauravas, clouding his judgment, while Jatayu associated with the virtuous Rama, enhancing his moral clarity. The company we keep significantly shapes who we become.
How would you respond when faced with a moral crisis? Would you choose the path of Bhishma – compliance and silence, or Jatayu's path – resistance and virtue? Reflect upon this as you navigate through the labyrinth of life. Remember, the footprints we leave behind in the sands of time are a consequence of our choices, whether they lead to a Bhishma-like fall from grace or a Jatayu-like rise to glory.
Which path would you choose when faced with a moral crisis?
A. The path of Bhishma - compliance and silence
B. The path of Jatayu - resistance and virtue.
© 2023. P Mohan Chandran. All Rights Reserved.
21062023
Comments